Sep 1.jpg

HOME

 

WELCOME

 

NEWS

 

BRANCHES

 

GRASSHOPPERS

 

LEWIS’S BANK

 

CONTACT US

 

SITE MENU

<

THE ARGOSY PLAYERS - LIVERPOOL

The Argosy Players in: Dear Octopus by Dodie Smith

Staged: 11-13 December 1952 at Crane theatre Hanover Street Liverpool

The Argosy Players launch an ambitious production of “Dear Octopus” as their Winter 1952 offering, at the Crane Theatre, Liverpool.  This venue will become synonymous  both with the Players, and with Martins Bank Operatic Society, who between them stage at least two performances there each year.  Their reputation commands sizeable and appreciative audiences, with dramas staged usually over a run of two or three nights, and operatic productions being produced for between three and six nights. The play “Dear Octopus” is written by Dodie Smith, who is perhaps most famous for her classic “One Hundred and One Dalmations”. How do the Argosy Players hold up to scrutiny, in what is described as “an exceptionally difficult play for amateurs”? The following write up from the Spring 1953 issue of Martins Bank Magazine not only sets the scene, it is also a brutally honest critique! If there are holes to be picked, we can rely on the staff magazine not only to gush with praise both faint and sincere, but also to mention shortcomings and provide constructive criticism on everything from actors forgetting their lines, to the quality of the stage set, costumes, make-up, even the skills of the producer and director.

Sep 1.jpg

1953 01.jpgThe Argosy Players chose Dodie Smith's “Dear Octopus” for their Winter production at Crane Theatre, December 11th, 12th and 13th. It is an exceptionally difficult play for amateurs, because the action runs smoothly and evenly, with no tense drama and no real crises—just a few “situations” and minor “ scenes”. In the hands of amateurs a performance of such a play can easily become commonplace and one could not help noticing that the best moments of the production invariably occurred when the more experienced actors and actresses came together, the level of performance rising noticeably on these occasions.  The cast is a large one and that of itself presents difficulties for amateurs, as few companies can produce more than a dozen high quality performers and there were seven­teen parts in this play. Quite outstanding among the men were Ken Batten as the grandfather and Howell Jones as his son.  Ken's normal identity was completely submerged in the part and Howell Jones's stage presence always commands and holds complete attention.  David Walpole, who appeared by kind permission of the Shelagh Elliott-Clarke School of Dance and Drama, as one of the grandchildren, was natural without being precocious and the talent and finish of his performance augurs well for his future when he goes on the stage. It is very pleasant to record the success of a newcomer to the Players, and Heather Bartlett as one of the grandchildren certainly scored a bull with a very appealing performance.

Sep 1.jpg

 

 

Another newcomer who played the part of the third grandchild was Dawn Rimmer: she made a very promising debut. The parts of the father and mother of two of the grandchildren were played by Kenneth Johnson and Ann Smellie. Kenneth was sparkling, good throughout: Ann's make-up for the part was on the young side and as a consequence her performance did not seem as convincing as it might have been. The part of the eldest grandchild was played by Brian Isaacson, with Jean Boothman as his wife. Brian was somewhat wooden: Jean's performance improves with each fresh part she takes and she is rapidly moving to the front rank of the company.  Of the remaining ladies the performances of Nora Owen, Hilary Parr and Maud Melville were outstanding.

1953 Dear Octopus MBM-Sp53P14

Sep 1.jpg

Left to right: Brian Isaacson, Ann Smellie, Howell Jones, Nora Owen, Dawn Rimmer, Kathleen Horsburgh,

Hilary Parr, Jean Boothman, Ken Johnson, Ken Batten, Maud Melville, Adeline Smith and Thea Bower.

Sep 1.jpg

On the night we attended Maud was the one member of the company to secure a spontaneous outburst of applause at the end of one of her pieces. Nora can conjure up drama, mystery, tragedy or whatever else the action calls for by her very movements and she is a first-rate amateur. Hilary starts off with the natural advantages of a sweet and appealing personality and she has learned how to use them on the stage to the advantage of whatever part she is given. Full marks also to Jeanne Harlow for her very refreshing presentation of the part of the bustling parlour maid and to Nessa Paisley as the unobtrusive but efficient children's nurse. We have left till the last our comments on the remaining three characters.

 

We felt that Thea Bower was miscast as the mischief-making member of the family. The character was so far removed from Thea's own personality that we felt it was beyond her, though she got quite a lot out of the part. Similarly, we felt that it was asking too much of Kathleen Horsburgh to transform her quiet and retiring personality into a 70-odd year old Titian-haired representation of an old lady who has been a bit of a gay bird in her day and still knows how to make the men turn round when she enters a room. This is not to say that the performance was not good, rather that it was steady without being brilliant.  And lastly we come to Adeline Smith, as Octopus herself. She certainly put up the best performance she has ever given us and everyone who saw the show was loud in her praises. To this spate of congratulation we would most sincerely like to add our quota. We do not think there is anyone in the Argosy Players who could have done it better, except Maud Melville, but, at the same time, we feel that the part needed someone more dominating, more Octopus-like. We had pathos, querulousness, fussing and many of the other trying qualities associated with old age, but above all we needed dominance. We did not see the charming old lady who made every single member of the large household jump to do her bidding without pausing to question the reason why. This representation, the true representation, was not, could not be vouchsafed to us.

 

The production was by Norman H. Hubbard. We very much regret that the conditions prevailing at the time when our photographer was in attendance rendered it impossible for him to carry out his assignment, and it was only possible for one photograph to be taken and this was a made-up scene and not in proper dress at that. When one recalls the beauty of the dinner table scene in the last act, when, incidentally, Howell Jones reached the peak of his performance, it is not a little frustrating that it was not recorded. It is mainly in the photographs that the interest of our colleagues in other parts of the country is sustained in a local production and, inconvenient though such interruptions are at a dress rehearsal, we hope that producers, in future, will arrange for proper facilities to be provided for us to do our work.

Sep 1.jpg

 

M

Sep 1.jpg

<,